tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4370268061829710124.post1003779599287141035..comments2024-03-06T03:36:43.359-06:00Comments on Robert Fisher: Thinking out loud (3.0): To boldly — what no one has —’d beforeRoberthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16733274876782876659noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4370268061829710124.post-69702354240757413262008-10-09T08:45:00.000-05:002008-10-09T08:45:00.000-05:00I think the principle amounts to: “Don’t waste you...I think the principle amounts to: “Don’t waste your time trying to shoe-horn D&D into a shoe it was never meant to fit.”<BR/><BR/>In the past, I think I wanted to change monsters because I wanted D&D to be more of a simulation. Which risks running afoul of the principle.<BR/><BR/>If I’m changing the monsters, however, in order to try to enhance an aspect of the game; then perhaps I’m actually following the principle.Roberthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16733274876782876659noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4370268061829710124.post-74512197429204131942008-10-07T13:33:00.000-05:002008-10-07T13:33:00.000-05:00It's only at odds with the principle if the princi...It's only at odds with the principle if the principle implied that you must take everything as written as Gospel, which it doesn't. From where I'm sitting, there's no contradiction here at all.James Maliszewskihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00341941102398271464noreply@blogger.com